<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Would a 50&quot; LED DLP (1080p) be good for me?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.myledtvreviews.com/led-dlp-tv/would-a-50-led-dlp-1080p-be-good-for-me/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.myledtvreviews.com/led-dlp-tv/would-a-50-led-dlp-1080p-be-good-for-me</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:57:59 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ShadowChimp</title>
		<link>http://www.myledtvreviews.com/led-dlp-tv/would-a-50-led-dlp-1080p-be-good-for-me/comment-page-1#comment-1588</link>
		<dc:creator>ShadowChimp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myledtvreviews.com/led-dlp-tv/would-a-50-led-dlp-1080p-be-good-for-me#comment-1588</guid>
		<description>No get an LCD!!!!!!

Check out this model

Samsung- LN-50A650&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No get an LCD!!!!!!</p>
<p>Check out this model</p>
<p>Samsung- LN-50A650<br /><b>References : </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tech10171968</title>
		<link>http://www.myledtvreviews.com/led-dlp-tv/would-a-50-led-dlp-1080p-be-good-for-me/comment-page-1#comment-1587</link>
		<dc:creator>tech10171968</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 05:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myledtvreviews.com/led-dlp-tv/would-a-50-led-dlp-1080p-be-good-for-me#comment-1587</guid>
		<description>DO LED DLP&#039;s provide a better picture than LCD&#039;s? I&#039;m on the fence about that; to be perfectly honest I&#039;m not so sure the *average* consumer would be able to tell the difference if the two TV&#039;s weren&#039;t standing side-by-side.

That being said, I think a LED-based DLP is a good buy. The bulb-based lamps in the first-gen DLP&#039;s tend to run very hot under normal operating conditions and, in this condition, the bulb tends to be quite fragile and can be easily shattered. LED&#039;s, on the other hand, tend to run a lot cooler and are not quite as prone to shattering. From my experience LED-based lamps should last you a lot longer between lamp replacements as well.

One last thing: bigger is not always better. It all depends on how large your room will be and how far away from the TV you usually sit. I&#039;ve seen people go to a theater and sit in the back rows to avoid having to crane their necks while looking at the giant screen; but these same people will go home to a tiny living room and sit only 5 feet from a gigantic 60&quot; big-screen TV. I&#039;ve always wondered why they would do something at home that they go out of their way to avoid doing at a theater.&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;electronics technician for over 20 years and former TV repairman</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DO LED DLP&#8217;s provide a better picture than LCD&#8217;s? I&#8217;m on the fence about that; to be perfectly honest I&#8217;m not so sure the *average* consumer would be able to tell the difference if the two TV&#8217;s weren&#8217;t standing side-by-side.</p>
<p>That being said, I think a LED-based DLP is a good buy. The bulb-based lamps in the first-gen DLP&#8217;s tend to run very hot under normal operating conditions and, in this condition, the bulb tends to be quite fragile and can be easily shattered. LED&#8217;s, on the other hand, tend to run a lot cooler and are not quite as prone to shattering. From my experience LED-based lamps should last you a lot longer between lamp replacements as well.</p>
<p>One last thing: bigger is not always better. It all depends on how large your room will be and how far away from the TV you usually sit. I&#8217;ve seen people go to a theater and sit in the back rows to avoid having to crane their necks while looking at the giant screen; but these same people will go home to a tiny living room and sit only 5 feet from a gigantic 60&quot; big-screen TV. I&#8217;ve always wondered why they would do something at home that they go out of their way to avoid doing at a theater.<br /><b>References : </b><br />electronics technician for over 20 years and former TV repairman</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarge</title>
		<link>http://www.myledtvreviews.com/led-dlp-tv/would-a-50-led-dlp-1080p-be-good-for-me/comment-page-1#comment-1586</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 04:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myledtvreviews.com/led-dlp-tv/would-a-50-led-dlp-1080p-be-good-for-me#comment-1586</guid>
		<description>If you&#039;re sitting only 6&#039; away, I would recommend a TV in the range of maybe 37&quot; at most.  a 50&quot; TV from that close of a range will just be too much for your eyes, and end up being a waste of a TV essentially.  With that money, you could get a 37&quot; and a decent surround sound system.&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re sitting only 6&#8242; away, I would recommend a TV in the range of maybe 37&quot; at most.  a 50&quot; TV from that close of a range will just be too much for your eyes, and end up being a waste of a TV essentially.  With that money, you could get a 37&quot; and a decent surround sound system.<br /><b>References : </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
